Semaglutide user experiences: what users themselves report

Users’ own accounts, not research. The accounts are self-selected and prove neither that it works nor that it is safe.

This page does not list users’ doses or where they got the medicine, and no figure on it is a recommendation. The dose is for the doctor to decide: Semaglutide dosage.

Updated 15 Oct 2026 Data: 2,744 posts and comments read, 1345 people Author: An AI model read and classified every account following written instructions

In short

Of 1345 people, 912 (68%) said semaglutide brought some benefit and 711 (53%) some harm.

We went through 1,244 public Reddit posts and a random sample of comments (1,500); the first-hand experiences of 1345 users among them are compiled here. Method: Where the accounts come from and how we read them. Use of AI: AI disclosure.

Where the accounts come from and how we read them

Sources: the Reddit forums r/WegovyWeightLoss (594 accounts), r/Ozempic (425), r/Semaglutide (350), r/Peptides (35), r/Retatrutide (26), r/Mounjaro (23), r/Zepbound (20), r/cagrilintide (13), r/liraglutide (13), r/Biohackers (4), r/CagriSema (1) and r/bpc_157 (1), 14 Oct 2025 to 12 Oct 2026. The posts were retrieved from a public Reddit archive. Of those, 1,244 were first-person posts about semaglutide, and every one was read. In addition, 7,187 comments met the same criteria in the same period (12 months, 13 Oct 2025 to 13 Oct 2026), and a random 1,500 of them were read. The sample was drawn with a fixed seed, so it can be repeated.

Coding: for each account we recorded the route, reported benefits and harms, how strong a harm was, whether and why the person stopped, length of use and other substances used at the same time. We kept accounts that reported some effect, some harm, or no effect. Questions and plans were left out. A harm was recorded when the person reported it during use, even if the cause was uncertain. Several posts by one person count as one person. One person can mention several things, so the shares in the tables do not add up to 100.

Check: an AI model read and classified the posts following written instructions. A second, separate AI run classified a random tenth (124 posts) again without seeing the first classification. The main fields matched: 120/124 (97%). 150 of the comments were re-classified the same way, and the main fields matched: 141/150 (94%). 15 posts looked like marketing and are not in the figures.

Whose accounts these are: routes mentioned: injection 744, by mouth 77; the others did not say. The figures describe the writers and are not a recommendation. We do not know whether the writers’ medicine came from a pharmacy or from elsewhere.

Did semaglutide help? The overall picture

Of 1345 people, 565 (42%) reported benefit only, 347 (26%) both benefit and harm, 364 (27%) harm only and 69 (5%) neither.

Stopping. 179 people (13%) said they stopped or paused: 94 because of harms and 85 because they noticed no effect or for another reason.

Share = people / 1345.
Overall picture: benefit, harm or neitherPeopleShare
Benefit only56542%
Both benefit and harm34726%
Harm only36427%
Neither benefit nor harm695%

Posts vs. comments

The figures on this page combine two sets: all 795 people who described their own use in a post, and 550 people found only in comments. 7,187 comments met the criteria, and a random 1,500 of them were read, from the same period as the posts: 12 months, 13 Oct 2025 to 13 Oct 2026. Because only part of the comments was read, the combined shares are not an average of the whole discussion.

Comments reported benefit only clearly more often, and harms less often, than posts. Benefit only: 38% in posts and 49% in comments (difference +11 percentage points, 95% confidence interval +6 to +16). Some harm: 57% in posts and 46% in comments (difference -11 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -17 to -6).

A possible explanation, which we have not verified: people tend to write their own post when something goes wrong, while replies often say briefly that it worked. Neither group tells how often it really helps or harms, and the difference does not prove that it works.

Share = people / group n; number of people in brackets. Comments = people not already counted from posts. Difference = comments minus posts, from unrounded shares. A difference is clear when its 95% confidence interval does not include zero.
ReportedPosts (n = 795)Comments (n = 550)Difference, points (95% CI)Clear difference?
Benefit only38% (303)49% (270)+11 (+6, +16)Yes
Some harm57% (452)46% (251)-11 (-17, -6)Yes

Most common reported benefits

Of 1345 people. 912 (68%) mentioned some benefit; the table lists every benefit reported.

ReportedPeopleShare
Weight loss69452%
Less appetite and food noise35226%
Better blood sugar or HbA1c524%
Better mood302%
More energy262%
Less urge to drink161%
Less joint pain161%
Better sleep or sleep apnoea101%
Lower blood pressure91%
Better blood lipids71%
Better liver values or liver fat30%
Other benefit635%

Share = people / 1345.

Most common reported harms

Of 1345 people. 711 (53%) mentioned some harm; 70 said explicitly they had none.

ReportedPeopleShare
Nausea21216%
Stomach pain or bloating1209%
Vomiting957%
Fatigue927%
Constipation876%
Food aversion or eating too little796%
Diarrhoea604%
Burping413%
Headache343%
Mood or anxiety343%
Heartburn or reflux312%
Hair loss201%
Insomnia or sleep problems181%
Loose skin or facial change151%
Muscle loss or weakness141%
Raised heart rate or palpitations131%
Low blood pressure or faintness101%
Injection site reaction91%
Dizziness81%
Dehydration71%
Rash or itch71%
Skin pain, tingling or burning71%
Gallbladder60%
Allergic reaction, hives or rash40%
Low blood sugar20%
Other, rarer harm13010%
Harms mentioned but not named957%

Share = people / 1345.

How severe were the harms?

Of the 704 people who described how strong a harm was, 300 (43%) described it as mild, 328 (47%) as clearly bothersome and 76 (11%) as severe. The strength is the writer's own description, not a doctor's assessment.

Share = people / 704.
Strength of the harm as the writer described itPeopleShare
Mild: minor and manageable30043%
Clearly bothersome: several days, sleep or work affected32847%
Severe: emergency visit, hospital or unable to function7611%

Harms known from research and regulators: What are the side effects of semaglutide?

How long did people use semaglutide?

869 of 1345 people (65%) said how long they had been using it at the time of writing. Where one person wrote several posts, the longest stated time counts.

Share = people / 869.
Stated length of usePeopleShare
Under a week809%
1-4 weeks12314%
1-3 months23127%
Over 3 months43550%

Many people post partway through, often in the first days or as soon as harms start, so short times are over-represented. The numbers describe the writers; they do not say how long it should be used.

Other substances at the same time

163 of 1345 people (12%) mentioned using other medicines or products at the same time. We do not name them on this page.

Injection or tablet?

Of those who said how they took it, 744 described injections and 77 tablets taken by mouth. The others did not say.

Of those who injected it, 481 (65%) reported some benefit and 435 (58%) some harm, most often nausea (145, 19%).

Of those who took tablets, 64 (83%) reported some benefit and 38 (49%) some harm. The group is small (77 people, publication threshold 40), so the shares are uncertain. The groups cannot be compared with each other, because the writers and their situations differ.

A prescription medicine: what this page does not tell

Semaglutide is a prescription medicine; whether to use it and at what dose is for the doctor to decide. We did not record doses, dose changes, where the medicine came from or how much weight was lost, and we do not name the other medicines people used at the same time. Side effects seen in trials: What are the side effects of semaglutide?

The weight-loss drug side-effects guide has its own section on the side effects users report: what users themselves report about side effects. Its side-effect shares are higher than on this page because its posts were chosen for side-effect wording, while this page's posts are drawn from all posts about the medicine.

About dosing

We do not repeat the amounts or ways of use people mention, and we give no dosing or how-to instructions. The dose is for the doctor to decide. Approved doses and trial doses, with sources: Semaglutide dosage in studies. Legal status: Is semaglutide legal in Finland?

What can be concluded?

Weight loss and less appetite were the most common reported benefits and nausea the most common harm. The accounts do not tell how much weight was lost, and they do not replace a doctor's assessment.

The accounts prove neither that it works nor that it is safe. The writers are self-selected, people tend to post when something goes wrong, and the accounts cannot separate the effect of the medicine from other causes. The research and its evidence levels: Semaglutide: what the research shows.

Quotes

Short excerpts in the writers’ own words. Writers’ names and links are not shown. We picked quotes from every group: benefit, both benefit and harm, no effect, harms and people who stopped.

Other summaries made with the same method: BPC-157 user experiences, Retatrutide user experiences, Cagrilintide user experiences, Tirzepatide user experiences, Liraglutide user experiences, NAD+ user experiences, MOTS-c user experiences and user experiences with collagen and skin peptides.

Content is general information about research, not medical advice. If you have symptoms, contact a healthcare professional.